Category: Category 1
Date:
Time:
Remote Name:
152.163.253.37
Remote User:
My "Live and Let Live" Policy basically
assumed that the gay servicemember could disclose his
or her sexuality with discretion but would not publish it openly for anyone in
the general public to see. My concern that enforced secrecy (or an outright ban)
would create the presumption that a homosexual is (because of his inclinations
or "private choices") unable to take the full obligations of citizenship and is
therefore a second-class citizen. Similar reasoning can apply to gay marriage
and gay parenting.
Category: Category 1
Date:
Time:
Remote Name:
152.163.253.37
Remote User:
The greatest practical danger to a
self-published author like me was the idea that I would have to self-censor (or
screen with "adult id" or credit card) any sexually explicit passage that could
be perceived as prurient by any immature minor capable of finding the passage in
a searcg engine but not intellectually capable of
understanding the context of the passage. After all, that is why minors go to
school and take English, especially literature in connection with social
studies. They do not know how to apply context until they have had a basic educaiton in academic fundamentals, including abstract
thinking (mathematics).
Category: Category 1
Date:
Time:
Remote Name:
69.143.16.240
Remote User:
The deepest resentment against gay
marriage seems to be the idea that if expresses contempt for the idea of kindship and loyalty to one's blood family, and to the idea
of giving meaning to other family members whose sense of purpose comes from
family