CONSOLIDATED FOOTNOTE FILE FOR DADT CHAPTER 5

This file includes new notes as well as those originally published in 1997.  In the iUniverse version, the numbers start at 352.

Chapter 5 Running Footnotes (John W. Boushka; tally; match to original text on xchap5 file )

 1 Bill Boushka, "Military Ban: Constitutional Questions and Policy Proposal," Ground Zero News, March, 1995, p. 17. See also notes by editor Frank Whitworth.

2 "What is GLIL," The Quill, Oct., 1994. "Classical liberalism" refers to the notion that individual rights and expression are the most important value in a political system.

3 Advocates for Self-Government, Atlanta, 1988. Please call 1-800-932-1776 for detailed information. (www.self-gov.org)

4 See David Boaz, Libertarianism: A Primer (New York: Free Press, 1997) pp. 20-21. These pages present, for comparison, the standard political science charts (how Communism-Left completes a full circle with Fascism-Right, and how (leftist) Liberal, Libertarian, Populism, and "Conservatism" (old-fashioned usage) fit into a simple chart. Boaz uses the term "statism" as a practical synonym for "authoritarianism."

5 Harry Browne, Why Government Doesn't Work (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995).

6 Perry Deane Young, God's Bullies (New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston, 1982), contains a chapter on secretly closeted gays within the religious right and the Reagan administration, pp 132-154. True, conservative gays and Republican gays tend to take the attitude that you have to prove you're good enough as a person to belong regardless of the prejudice against "queers" as a "group." The closet and double-like becomes a source of feeling "special" or connected. Imagine this "Uncle Tom" attitude, carried to extreme, if applied to blacks during segregation. Also, see J. Jennings Moss, "The Outsiders," The Advocate, Oct. 29, 1996.

7 David Boaz and Edward Crane, "The Collapse of Statist Values," Market Liberalism (Washington, Cato Institute, 1993). However, in his Primer, Boaz uses the term "libertarianism" more broadly, reflecting an attitude of "classical liberalism" with great (but not radical or anarchistic) restraints on government, especially federal government.

8 Libertarian Party candidate (1996) for Pennsylvania Attorney General, T. Collins, wrote (in 1994) a white paper proposing the notion of "state citizenship" to avoid federal income taxes.

9 In practice, libertarians tend to favor term limits and are somewhat divided on campaign finance reforms; they would dislike adversarial politics but not want to interfere with candidates who can spend their own money.

10 The Christian concept corresponding to "cooperation" is "hospitality." The concept of "spontaneous order" was developed by F.A. Hayek and others: "Made Orders and Spontaneous Order" by Hayek, and "Two Kinds of Order" by Polanyi, in David Boaz (editor), The Libertarian Reader. (New York: Free Press, 1997).

10a Ch. 5 P 228 : Some libertarians favor eliminating all taxes! Good to see Minnesotans ("People's Socialist Republic of Minnesota," before Jesse Ventura) standing up to sports owners using public money (tax or gambling) to pay players' salaries rather than provide basic services. One newspaper letter-writer proudly announced his self-concept is strong enough to do without the Minnesota Twins! Another good question for libertarians is the practice of charging employers premiums for unemployment insurance.

In his 1996 presidential campaign, Harry Browne maintained that we can afford to get rid of the Federal income tax (and replace it with nothing) if we drastically reduce the Federal government to the purposes which, taken as literally as possible, the founding fathers apparently intended (especially when they wrote the Ninth and Tenth Amendments). These functions would include national defense, foreign policy, and a federal judiciary and perhaps (very minimally) oversight of interstate commerce. Browne suggests a national asset sale to pay for these functions.  

10b Ch. P 228, Section 02 - general comment. Libertarianism defines "morality" in modern terms of personal accountability and non-harm to others. Older forms of moral thinking postulated that the individual must meet certain cultural obligations such as military service and parenting (through the family) before the person can be respected or even have significant rights as his or her own person. This was founded on interpretations of religion, survivalism, and political expedience. Pre-requisite "obligations" somehow covered up inequities between families (but we know this didn't work, but we might see this kind of thinking, well represented by columnist Pat Buchanan, for instance, resurface).

10c  There are a few libertarian-leaning law schools, especially George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., known also for its Institute of Humane Studies, which provides grants for individual freedom policy education and policy research and invites students to summer forums, 

11 Andrew R. Cecil, Introduction, The Ethics of Citizenship from Lectures on Moral Values in a Free Society (The University of Texas at Dallas, 1980), p. 16.

12 Boaz, Libertarianism, op. cit., pp. 64-70.

 13 James Hutson, "The Bill of Rights and American Revolutionary Experience," from A Culture of Rights, ed. by Michael Lacey (London: Cambridge University, 1991).

14 Robert Bork, The Tempting of America (New York: The Free Press, 1990), p. 123.

Robert Bork, Slouching Towards Gomorrah (New York: Regan, 1996), p. 6.

15 Michael Lerner, The Politics of Meaning (New York: Addison-Wesley, 1996).

16 Andrew Peyton Thomas, "Can We Ever Go Back?" The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 9, 1995. Following the reasoning of Bork, Thomas and North, I wonder if I have compromised my own moral body because (although still HIV-negative) I am no longer allowed to give blood or donate organs because of my past sexual behaviors. As with reproductive rights, and drugs, is my body the property of the whole community or only of me?

17 Supporters of the recently vetoed bill against late-term partial-birth abortions describe horrific procedures where babies are murdered with only their heads still within the womb (before they are legally born, when their killing is still legal abortion). Certainly I abhor such procedures: the woman's control of her body is just a hypothetical point in these situations.

18 In the 1976 film Logan's Run, everyone was executed at the age of 30!

19 William Murchison, Reclaiming Morality in America (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1994), p. 11.

20 Former National Gay and Lesbian Task Force President Melinda Paras always spoke of fundamental collective "fairness" as an underlying moral value. It's not fair for the handicapped to be denied accessible parking spaces, and it's not fair for gays and lesbians to be discriminated against (speech for Fairfax County Va. GAA, April 1996).

21 George Will, Statecraft as Soulcraft: What Government Does (New York: Touchstone, 1983). P. 31 discusses conscription in the context of self and community interest.

21a Ch. 5 P. 233, pr. 1. That is, self-actualization, for some people, implies self-transcendence.

22 Dean Hannotte, introduction to Paul Rosenfels, Homosexuality: The Psychology of the Creative Process (New York: 9th Street Center, 1971/1986), p. iii.

23 William Channing, "A Human Being Cannot Be Justly Owned," from Boaz, Libertarian Reader, pp. 88-91. This piece, to condemn slavery, argues self-ownership from the exclusivity of property rights and from the moral equivalence of rights and responsibilities.

F24 Joseph Steffan, Honor Bound: A Gay American Fights for the Right to Serve his Country (New York: Villard, 1992), p. 16.

25 Hillman, The Soul's Code, op. cit., p. 6.

26 Steffan, op. cit., p. 145.

27 Anthony and Cleopatra (1606); p.d.

MacKenzie, op. cit., p. 201, cites the Naval Academy Honor Code. The Code does not now require midshipmen to turn in others they suspect of cheating; however a midshipman resigned in 1996 out of conscience for failure to report a crime of one of his classmates.

28 Dean Hannote, We Knew Paul, Introduction (New York: Ninth Street Center), p. xiv.

29 Stephen Carter, "The Insufficiency of Honesty," Atlantic Monthly, February, 1996, pp 74-76.

30 David Mayer, The Constitutional Thought of Thomas Jefferson (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1994), pp. 323-324.

31 Chai Feldblum, "Sexual Orientation, Morality, and the Law: Devlin Revisited," (Georgetown University Law School and University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 1996).

31a Ch. 5 P 235, pr. 4: Drugs like cocaine stimulate the activity or a brain catalytic chemical called dopamine. People become addicted when they cannot generate this activity naturally (as during sleep, sex, food, intellectual accomplishment, or plain "fun"). So we make "moral" issues over how people generate dopamine activity within their own brains!

You could say drug laws may keep about 20% of people who would otherwise drugs from using them. A similar argument can be made about prostitution and gambling laws. You believe they really work?  There is more about drug testing at http://www.doaskdotell.com/content/labor.htm

32 Peter McWilliams provides a detailed history of how our drug laws evolved and how they may even feed corporate "special interests." Peter McWilliams, Ain't Nobody's Business If Your Do (Los Angeles: Prelude, 1995), pp. 271-337. Or consider Richard Condon's 1960 novel, Mile High, in which organized crime conspires to bring about Prohibition in order to make a killing on it.

33 Newt Gingrich, To Renew America (New York: Harper Collins, 1995), p. 178.

34 In California, farmers have actually been forced to quarter National Guard units searching for marijuana, a clear violation of the Third Amendment.

35 New York state had tried a "zero tolerance" law in 1973; the subway was covered with signs "don't get caught holding the bag."

36 Government also abuses seizures in the environmental areas. James Bovard, "New Assault on Property Rights," The Washington Times, Oct. 24, 1996, p. A16.

36a Ch. 5 P 236 pr. 1 Picking on marijuana users is like the military's picking on gays, as the easiest (and most naive) "criminals" to user as prey for the politicians.

In 1997, the Virginia House of Delegates in the General Assembly has already voted to repeal its 1978 state law allowing the medicinal use of marijuana. NBC Dateline covered the asset forfeiture problem in a broadcast in January, 1997.  

37 William F. Buckley and others, "The War on Drugs is Lost," National Review, Feb. 12, 1996, p. 34.

38 Frank Herbert, Dune (New York: Putnam, 1965).

39 Robert Samuelson, "Anti-Smoking Hysteria," The Washington Post, Apr. 23, 1997, p. A21.

40 An appeals court in Philadelphia did strike down the 1995 "Communications Decency Act." {as did the Supreme Court in 1997).

41 Aren't people who get addicted to nicotine morally responsible for their own predicaments? Maybe not if they were deceived by false advertising. But when a litigant lost a wrongful-death suit, her attorney claimed, "we're taking personal responsibility to an extreme." Indeed we should!

Ch. 5 P 237, pr. 2: This means also that, in criminal trials, there would be no "insanity" acquittals, no twinkie defense, not even the "sleepwalking defense." A person answers for his own acts. Period.

42 But see Joan Taylor, "Child Pornography and Free Speech," Liberty, Jan. 1997, p. 38, for a discussion of the way the proposed Child Pornography Prevention Act which would criminalize the depiction of under-age sex even in computer-generated art (and who would determine who "looks" underage?) The "theory" is that prurient interest in children must be stopped.

43 There are four kinds of residential real-estate assumption: (1) full (when the second borrower qualifies and the first gets a novation releasing from liability (2) assigned, when the original owner is liable only for missed payments (3) simple (common with FHA until 1989) and (4) Subject-to, which leaves the original owner completely responsible forever. The common law rule against assignments holds an original borrower liable until the lender gives permission for assumption. Some left-wing writers have urged consumers with bad credit or with no credit to assume loans and insist that sellers "trust" them and not make them qualify.

In the late 80s, when real estate values were declining in some areas of the country, it was common for borrowers to “walk.” Lenders (often after takeovers and mergers or government rescues under the FDIC, following the notorious D’Oench, Duhme Doctrine) began to pursue them for deficiencies, sometimes after foreclosure sales for almost no value, for as long as 4 years after foreclosure (Wiedemer, A Homeowner’s Guide to Foreclosure, Dearborn Financial Pub., 1992).   Sellers in unqualified assumption situations would be exposed to deficiency lawsuits but this has not been reported much by the media.  See http://www.doaskdotell.com/content/realesta.htm for some philosophical points.

43a Ch. 5 P 238, pr. 1. Of course, the "hate crime" designation could assist a prosecutor to make the legal finding of "malice" in a homicide case. CBS "48 Hours" did present, on September 30, 1999, an alarming account on the rise of hate groups in this country; it is shocking that a woman could be driven out of town and hunted down for intermarriage.

43b. “Hate crimes” legislation, in fact, strikes me as an attempt to have two wrongs make a right. The practical justification, in the case of gay-bashing, is that juries may let an accused off more easily if “homosexual panic” is allowed as a defense, so we need the counter-weight of hate-crimes designation (for gays).  I say, punish the crime according to its heinousness, regardless of the victim or of the excuses of the perpetrator. Trouble is, intent and state of mind and pre-meditation are well-established concepts of criminal law. I would encourage laws which treat “hatred” (on a case-by-case basis) as legally a form of premeditation (which wouldn’t have the “principle” problem of treating crime differently according to the class of the victim), but would discourage the reference to the category of the victim in determining the degree of malice.  (Remember the killer of Matthew Shepard was punished almost to the full extent of the law anyway.)  But in June 2000, the House passed a bill adding disability and sexual orientation to categories that trigger hate crimes consideration.   

44 Peter Unger, Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence (London: Oxford University, 1996).

44a Ch.5 P 239, pr. 4: Virginia Gov. George Allen wrote to me: "I believe that the historical husband-and-wife family is the very foundation of our society, and that the state should reaffirm the primacy of the time-tested family model whenever it is challenged or whenever alternative models are held out as its equivalent."

44b  But some historians maintain that, whatever the religious right claims to be in the Bible, the Western “nuclear family” did not become accepted as a social model until the time of Napoleon, and then during the Victorian era.  If women were regarded as “property” or as “inferior” it is hard to see how monogamous intimate marriages could provide much psychological sustenance.  

45 In some African cultures, women are so little respected as equals that female circumcision and clitoral mutilation is still practiced.

Ch. 5 P. 239 fn 45: One can turn the arranged-marriage issue around, of course. Learning to love an assigned partner can be perceived as the fulfillment of a moral obligation and sign of religious obedience.

46 Note the reunion of the Henry family at the end of Herman Wouk's War and Remembrance.

47 Don Feder, "Society's Stake in Defending Marriage," The Washington Times, July 17, 1996, p. A15.

48 Here's one amusing affront: Nate Penn and Lawrence Larose: The Code: Time-tested Secrets for Getting What You Want from Women - Without Marrying Them (New York: Fireside [Simon & Schuster] 1996).

48a The Census 2000 reports now that less than 25% of all households are traditionally married couples with children. The percent of unmarried couples was 1.9% and the number of single households raised 21% (since 1990). 

49 But some observers disagree that most middle class parents "need" two incomes. Shannon Brownlee and Matthew Miller, "Lies Parents Tell Themselves about Why They Work," U.S. News and World Report, May 12, 1997, p. 58. On the other hand, some sole-breadwinner fathers probably find genuine relief from the intimacy of child-rearing and fatherhood in long hours at work.

49a  According to a General Accounting Office (GAO) survey released in January 2002, woemn’s income had fallen further behind men’s between 1995 and 2001. 60% of males in corporate executive ranks had children at home, whereas only 40% of females did, a figure which suggests (to the chagrin of some) that the “mommy track” or even taking advantage of maternity leave materially reduces female advancement in the conventional corporate workplace.

49b Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Tyagi. The Two Income Trap: Why Middle Class Mothers and Fathers Are Growing Broke. New York: Basic Books, 2003. A major tenet of this book is that the two-income family has synergized with the bidding up of suburban housing prices, often trying to get the best school districts for children, with an end result that families with children lose most of their disposable income and wind up in debt.

49c  For an interesting employment discrimination case on Wall Street where female executives who took maternity leave say they were penalized and unable to compete with men who did not take paternity leave (or maybe single men) see ABC Nightline, Jan 18, 2006, “Six Women Sue Wall Street Bank, Allege Sex Discrimination: Employees Say They Have Been Passed Over in Promotions for Men,” at http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/LegalCenter/story?id=1517249   The bank is Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein Securities LLC.

50 Barbara Vobejda, "Social Trends Show Signs of Slowing: Family Characteristics Appear More Stable" The Washington Post, Nov. 27, 1996, p. A3.

50a  Robert Kuttner, in an overview, “The Politics of Family,” for aspecial issue on family values in The American Prospect, April 8, 2002, writes cogently: “So there are basically two contending narratives about family. In the first, modernity itself ruined the family and traditional values are the cure… In the second, a lot of ugly realities were concealed by ‘traditiona; values’;  …,”  

51 Actually, southern Christian fundamentalism has sometimes stood up for the right of women to have opportunities of their own apart from homemaking their husbands. Christine Heyman, Southern Cross: The Beginnings of the Bible Belt (New York, Knopf, 1997), and Goodwin, op. cit.

51a  ABC “Good Morning America” has run a series on the controversy about working v. “stay-at-home” moms Feb. 22-24 2006. One point was that children of working mothers may learn independence earlier and benefit from knowledge of a mother’s as well as father’s career. Salaried working mothers often had difficulty with constant on-call expectations. Again, to me, the idea of being sexually attracted to someone who would become economically dependent always came across to me as an oxymoron.

References: (Linda Hirshman)  http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/AmericanFamily/story?id=1653069&page=1

Mommy wars: video submissions to  ABC: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1655109

52 Ed Mickens, "Is There a Lavender Ceiling," Out, Dec. 1996, p. 150.

52a The Minneapolis Department of Health and Family Services conducted a survey in 1998 ("SHAPE") which reported that self-identified "GLBT" people showed a 41.3% achievement of undergraduate college degrees compared to 27.6% for self-identified "heterosexuals," and that 26.3% of GLBT's made over $46,400 a year compared to 17.5% for "heterosexuals." So maybe having fewer "responsibilities" (or more "disposable income") makes a difference. Rachel Gold, "Hennepin County study reveals income, education differences," Focus Point, July 7, 1999, p. 1.

53 Barbara Vobejda, "Day Care Study Offers Reassurance to Working Parents," The Washington Post, April 4, 1997, p. A1. The study was conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. But Brownlee and Miller, op. cit., raise troubling questions about typical day care and the affordability of good day care. ABC “Good Morning America” on Feb 25, 2002 reports that many parents intentionally delay having children because of the availability and cost of decent day care.

53a Ch. 5 P 242, pr. 1: Kirk and Madsen (see bibliography) provide a lot of discussion of the psychological problems that follow when gays can spend their resources on themselves. They see this as contributing to the "narcissistic" attitude of many gays in what they expect in relationships. And Norval Glenn, in "A Texbook Case of Marriage-Bashing," (Policy Review, May-June 1998, p. 5) criticizes current public school texts for presenting heterosexual marriage as just another lifestyle "choice." Darned right, it's supposed to get special privileges from the unmarred (pay or play!)

53b Ch.5 P. 242 pr. 2. William R. Mattox, Jr., argues "With big families come big rewards," in an op-ed in USA Today, July 6, 1999, p. 13A. He mentions Allan Carlson, president of the Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society, as pointing out "that government old-age programs tend to disrupt the natural economic incentive for adults to invest themselves in child rearing. Carlson says that if Social Security did not rob Peter to pay Paul, Americans would be more apt to appreciate the social-insurance value of raising children," rather than focusing on the "cost" of child-rearing. For example, Asian-American children from large families do well in school because older siblings (with loyalty) tutor younger ones, rather than competing with them. But are people really supposed to have children (at least partly) to be taken care of in their old age?

53c  In September 1987, Chilton Corporation (a credit reporting company eventually bought by TRW), when pressured by new owners after a leveraged buyout to squeeze on the bottom line, eliminated flex-time and part-time and forced a number of employees with child care and day care problems to resign, whereas the single and childless employees relatively prospered in the coming storm. (I was working there.)

Ch. 5 P 243, pr. 1. The "flat tax" could still be child-friendly if it maintained a per-child exemption (not deduction). But should this be limited to two or three children? Should it be limited to legally married couples? There is a trade-off between helping children and (sometimes) discouraging marriage, and this is a Fundamental Theorem of Social Engineering.

54 The usual proposal is a $500 per child credit; some conservatives (Phil Gramm) have wanted this amount to be $5000! There is already a credit of up to $720 per dependent (maximum of two dependents) for day care expenses to enable a parent to work. See The Ernst & Young Tax Guide 1997 (New York: Wiley, 1996), p. 464. President Clinton has proposed college tuition tax credits for parents of dependent children, but conservatives generally claim this just drives up tuitions. See Pete Dupont, "Providing Fuel for Tuition Inflation," The Washington Times, Apr. 20, 1997, p. B1.

55 Nash, Time, op. cit. (see Ch. 3) and ABC "Nightline," Apr. 16, 1997.

56 Philip Lawler, "Sex, Marriage, Love, and Babies," The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 4, 1996.

56a Ch. 5 P 245, pr. 2. But "poverty" still requires that the priest derive his sense of identity from the teachings of the Church, not from his own head. The destructiveness of the priesthood marriage ban is well known.  

57 In the 1950's, "legal separation" was the penultimate remedy. Situation comedies (I Love Lucy) were built around couples that "fight," but up close and personal, I found the idea of fights (the few times I saw them in other peoples' families) terrifying.

58 Barbara Whitehead, The Divorce Culture (New York: Knopf, 1996), provides an interesting history of the transition from "vulgar" to "expressive" divorce as our society has migrated toward emphasis on personal fulfillment and "growth."

59 Back in the 1950's, Ladies Home Journal ran a column, "Can this Marriage be Saved?" by Dorothy Disney. 

60 There was a famous case (Bobbitt) in Virginia in 1993 where an abused wife mutilated her husband's genitals.

61 Sheppard and Kathryn Kominas, Accepting Ourselves & Others (Minneapolis: Hazelden, 1996), p. 321, 325-326. Also, Brian McNaught, Gay Issues in the Workplace (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993), chapter "Homophobia and Heterosexism," pp. 47-64.

62 Ben Wattenberg, "The Grandfather Gap," PBS Broadcast, Apr. 18, 1997. The birthrate in the U.S. has dropped significantly since 1990. The question is posed, does public policy need to be rigged to encourage middle-class parents to have more children now?

63 The Titanic, history series on A&E Cable History Channel, Sept., 1996.

64 The Communications Decency Act of 1996 is discussed in Chapter 6 (overturned by the Supreme Court in 1997). In 1958, the Supreme Court ruled against the Los Angeles Postmaster who had tried to stop the mailing of a homosexual periodical on the grounds that homosexuality per se was obscene. Ed Alwood, Straight News: Gays, Lesbians, and the News Media (New York: Columbia University, 1996), p. 34.

65 Some Fairfax County, Va. parents tried to have The Washington Blade removed from the public libraries in the early 1990's.

66 "Writing rights," The Advocate, Dec. 10, 1996, p. 16.

67 Before World War II, Mussolini unashamedly "taxed bachelors" to help fund his pro-natalist ideas. Crane Brinton, A History of Civilization, (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1960), p. 468. The Christian Coalition's Ralph Reed, in Contract with the American Family (Nashville: Moorings, 1995), correctly points out the burden of the IRS "marriage penalty" and, moreover, the provisions that (until 1996) denied homemakers the privilege of setting aside their proportion of family income in tax-deferred 401K's.

One subtle form of marriage penalty occurs on the Schedule D, Capital Gains and Losses form. A single person may subtract up to $3000 in stock market losses, but married persons filing separately may deduct only $1500 each. Of course, the cap on loss deductions raises interesting public policy questions of its own.

67a   In fact, Caesar Augustus, Roman Emperor around the time of Christ, severely taxed men and denied inheritances to men who were not married by age 25. In Roman society, the accepted age for marriage was 14 for men and 12 for women. But marriages were “arranged,” infidelity was often acceptable, and infanticide (rather than abortion) was sometimes legal, as were the horrible spectacles in the Coliseum. Slaves came from conquered peoples.  “Morality” was more a “practical” thing in those days; there was no pretense of the right to life or of universal human rights. See US News and World Report, Jan 8, 2001, “The World in 1 AD.”   

68 Leon Eisenberg, "Is the Family Obsolete," The Key Reporter, Phi Beta Kappa, Spring, 1995. Scandinavian countries are well known for (significant) paid parental leave in private and public workplaces. They make no bones about requiring the childless to support families with children, although they try make up with laws protecting gays from other discrimination. In 1996, a poll of Swedish voters showed they opposed tax cuts because they don't want to give up "family welfare." Will this lead to a "brain drain" of younger single skilled workers?

68a Ch. 5 P 247, fn 68: A few non-profits with social agendas practice what they preach and offer paid maternity (even paternity) leave. But how will religious organizations who believe women belong in the home treat female employees?

68b Ch. 5 P 247 pr. 4. Maybe the worst insult to heterosexuals is to have to deliberately recognize heterosexuality's own existence! After all, Master and Johnson authored Heterosexuality (Harper, 1995).

68c.  In 2002, there was study showing that children of women who work full time before their children are at least nine months old do not do as well on intellectual performance.  A similar result seems to hold with children who had little breast feeding. This, along with studies regarding reduced fertility among women who postpone having children for career, seems to point to a “collective” problem when women who want to have children early must “compete” with those who don’t or when men reduce the value of fatherhood in their own purposes for sexuality. 

68d.  Although most mainstream employers today do not live to consider marital status or family obligation as relevant to the ability or will to do most jobs (and may believe they are legally forbidden from inquiring in many states), marital status and especially having dependents definitely affects eligibility for financial aid for trade schools (as usually administered by state and sometimes federal programs).  This can differentially affect laid-off employees seeking to acquire new technical schools and certifications for career transitions. 9source: KRS Computer & Business Scholo, Bloomington, Mn.)

68e  Allan Carlson talks about the “family wage” as a motive behind FDR’s New Deal, on p. 148 of his 1988 book Family Questions: Reflections on the American Social Crisis,” (Transactions Press, 1988), in a chapter called “The Moral Politics of the Minimum Wage.” Carlson believes that modernism and equal career opportunities for women are undermining family socialization.See also note 53b.

 69 Jonathan Rauch, "A Pro-Gay, Pro-Family Policy,". The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 29, 1994

70 Males, The Scapegoat Generation (1996).

71 George Gilder, Sexual Suicide (New York: Quadrangle, 1973);

George Gilder, Men and Marriage (Louisiana: Pelican, 1986).

72 Arkes, The Weekly Standard, Nov. 30, 1995.

73 On Dec. 3, 1996, a Hawaii state judge ruled that the state had no rational basis to ban same sex marriage which, on the face, discriminates on the basis of gender; the judge also ruled that the state had not shown gay couples had not performed as successfully as parents in traditional families. The judge put his own ruling on hold for appeal to the Hawaii Supreme Court. See Barbara Vobejda and John Yang, "Children: A Pivotal Issue in Gay Marriage Ruling," The Washington Post, Dec. 5, 1996, p A3. Our discussion of gay parents follows shortly. In April, 1997, Hawaii seemed to headed toward a state constitutional amendment denying official recognition to same-sex marriage, but requiring domestic partnership benefits in some circumstances

73a Ch. 5 Pg 249, pr. 2: A CPA tells me that, until the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (well known as a policy blunder over the passive rental income issue), there was an intentional "single penalty" in the tax code, as well as the "marriage penality."

Remember, legally married partners cannot be required to testify against one another (a real "privilege"). In fact, if legally married spouses file separate returns, the IRS can no longer hold one spouse responsible for the other's debts (even though the "marriage penalty" may be owed). On the other hand, with domestic partners, not only are "palimony" suits rare, alienation of affection suits (like a recent case in North Carolina) cannot happen. Domestic partners may not enjoy various other benefits, such as "inheritance" of rent-controlled apartments.

When companies offer equivalent "domestic partnership" healthcare benefits to not-legally married partners of employees, the (non-contributory) premiums are taxable by the IRS. A very few companies have paid to offset this tax. Another little example of where tax policy tries to do social engineering.

Another example of workplace disparity: heterosexuals often meet future spouses in the workplace; for gays (especially men), courting in the workplace is dangerous, to say the least.

In Bob Powers and Alan Ellis,  A Manager's Guide to Sexual Orientation in the Workplace (Routledge, 1995), practical arguments for same-sex domestic partnership benefits are presented, from p. 125. For example, the City of Seattle found no actuarial risk when the policy was instituted in 1990 (and cancelled its surcharge), and the cost of caring for a partner with HIV is usually less than caring for children with severe disabilities; and gays and lesbians do have children to raise.

Gerald Celente: Trends 2000: How to Prepare for and Profit from Change in the 21st Century (Warner, 1998) talks about the "millennium family" (only 26% of families in 1999 are "traditional" one-earner husband-wife with children) and the notion of "progressive libertarianism."

73b marben- contains a summary of the benefits and drawbacks of legal marriage. In early 2000, the Vermont house passed a “civil union” bill offering most of the marital “privileges” to same-sex unions, but not the use of the word “marriage.”  The Vermont state senate approved the bill in April, 2000; many other states have passed laws exempting themselves from recognizing “civil unions” in other states.  Certain other domestic arrangements may have some of the privileges.

Whatever the philosophical public policy debate, there is a detailed discussion of actual financial planning issues for gay and lesbian couples (including the effects of Vermont’s law and of domestic partnership employment benefit provisions in many areas) in the essay “Straight Money Facts for Gays and Lesbians” at http://www.ihatefinancialplanning.com/

In October 2001 California passed and Gov Gray Davis signed a domestic partnership law for California. The law will give registered couples several basic legal and financial tools. Partners will soon have the legal right to make life
and death decisions on each other's behalf. As enacted under AB 25, domestic partners will have these rights:

- Relocate with a domestic partner without losing unemployment benefits.
- Use sick leave to care for an ill partner or the child of a domestic partner.
- Be exempt from state income tax the health benefits provided to domestic partners.
- File disability benefits on behalf of an incapacitated partner.
- Make medical decisions in the hospital or act as a conservator.
- Sue for wrongful death as well as seek damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
- Administer a partner's estate.
- Bequeath property to a domestic partner using the statutory will.
- Adopt a partner's child using the stepparent adoption process.
- Continue health benefits for surviving partners of governmentemployees and retirees.

Additionally, AB 25 requires health plans to offer domestic partner coverage to businesses and associations similar to coverage offered to dependents of employees and subscribers. This requirement will assist small and medium-sized employers that decide to offer domestic partner benefits to their employees. Further, opposite sex couples may register as domestic partners.

73c. See Owen Ullmann, "Tax Break for Couples Could Create Imbalance Elsewhere," USA Today, August 10, 1999, for a mathematical analysis of the marriage penalty and marriage benefits in the tax code. Should government reward legally committed sexual complementarity by making everyone else (especially gays) subsidize it?  

73d  Of course, others besides legal spouses and children can receive inheritances, but legal spouses generally may not be left out of wills.  In June 2000, the House of Representatives voted to repeal the inheritance tax (over the sliding $600,000+ limits) completely over some timetable, appealing to the argument to save family farms and family businesses. Above these limits, the estate tax rate raises to 55% now. It could be argued (in conjunction with note 196) that the bill encourages family cohesiveness and weighs against individuals (often gays) who set up lives around interests distant from family matters. The left would argue that completely abolishing the estate tax preserves inherited “privilege.” 

Objectivists have supported the idea of inheritance, but generally maintain that an individual will fare well or poorly in life based on how well he or she uses the inheritance. Another hidden idea is the “dead hand” – a post-probate condition on the receipt of funds by heirs. The ability of heirs to keep the money (or receive it from trust) could depend on some specific behavioral requirements. This is more common in Britain than in the US. For example, an heir could have to get married (legally, heterosexually) or stay married. This is surprisingly little known by the public as a whole.

73e  The Canadian government is not appealing a ruling from the Ontario Supreme Court in June 2003 essentially allowing same-sex marriages. The effect may be that Canada joins Belgium and the Netherlands as countries that legally recognize same-sex marriage (Belgium recognizes it for immigrants only from countries that also recognize it, and the Netherlands has a long residency requirement, whereas Canada has neither). This could cause interesting situations as the United States normally recognizes Canadian marriages. See Allison Dunfield, “Ottawa won’t appeal same-sex marriage rulings,” Toronto Globe and Mail, June 17 2003.  

73f  Jeff Jacoby, in an editorial “Same-sex marriage might ruin traditional family life,” produces a rather collectivist argument against gay marriage in his July 2003 Boston Globe op-ed. To answer “rationalist” arguments for gay marriage, Jacoby quotes a Globe report that of the 5700 gay and lesbian unions in the past  3 years, 2000 came from previous heterosexual marriages. Of course, such an argument diminishes the moral importance of the fact that 2000 individuals made personal choices (now more protected by the Supreme Court as a fundamental right under due process in Lawrence v. Texas sodomy law opinion) for their own personal happiness but for which they can also be held personally accountable. Again, I would like to direct the argument more to the idea that marriage has a lot to do with providing for people who aren’t able to make all of their own choices, and cast the argument in terms of the notion that responsibility for self incorporates responsibility for others. Indeed the gay marriage debate will test the limits of self-ownership and individualism as a moral philosophy, and might well also bring back another debate about filial responsibility, as the elderly population grows and as the gap between rich and poor among families with children gets larger.

However, many adult children would maintain that they are entitled to recover lost wages or expenses from caring for parents. In some cases, this has led to intra-family fraud in guardianship or conservatorship of the elderly. Sometimes elderly persons are declared incompetent with little due process and defrauded by companies, also. See Barry Yoeman, “Stolen Lives: Thousands of older Americans are being robbed of their freedom, dignity and life savings by a legal system created for their protection. How can this happen?”  in The AARP Magazine, Jan/Feb 2004, p. 42.

73g David Wilkinson and Chris Stevenson proposed a Department of the American Family in an op-ed “In support of marriage” in The Washington Times, Dec. 16, 2005. The tone of the article expressed concern that many young and perhaps middle aged adults today have lost interest in even having children and raising them in such an individually competitive society. The article also refers to the (Healthy Marriage Initiative) and the Federal Marriage Amendment (attempted in the summer of 2004 to prevent gay marriage and failed) but seems to confuse the gay marriage issue with the “singles” issue so important in my own book.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20051215-092213-1663r.htm

Richard Sincere rebuked the idea of a “Department of the American Family” with his letter (“Regulation, bureaucracy and the family”) of Dec. 20, 2005 at http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20051219-093819-8943r_page2.htm

74 Mixner, op. cit., p. 141.

74a.  On the $600,000 limit (increasing every year since 1996), single people can of course leave their money as they choose (subject to the same limits), but sometimes their wills are challenged, and it is often difficult to leave a spouse out of a will if one wants so.

75 In the Bottoms case in Virginia, the grandmother sued to take custody away from her own lesbian daughter! Sharon Bottoms was even forbidden to have her partner present during visitations! The presumption that Bottoms violated Virginia's Crimes Against Nature law was used as a justification for the custody verdict from the state supreme court. In April, 1997, Bottoms sued to be allowed to see her daughter with her partner present. In another case in Florida, custody was awarded to a convicted murderer ex-husband! In Oklahoma, a lesbian actually lost custody to a deadbeat dad owing almost $30000. In North Carolina, however, a gay man regained custody in state appellate court after his male lover moved in. After Romer, courts may feel less inclined to cite sodomy laws in custody battles. See Tzivia Gover, "Fighting for Our Children," The Advocate, Nov. 26 1996, p. 22. (In 1999, a Texas judge ruled that a lesbian mother gaining custody in a divorce could not take her child to Metropolitan Community Church! Does the government decide what constitutes "religion" under the First Amendment?)  See also note 77.

75a Ch. 5 P 250, fn 75: There was a particularly egregious case in Maryland where a judge ordered a gay divorced man to allow his son near any other person with "homosexual tendencies."

75b  (Dec. 4, 2003, ABC News “Good Morning America”) The seven-year-old son of gay mother Sharon Huff was reprimanded by a teacher (in Louisiana) with letter to her parent for using “bad words” in explaining to a classmate that her mother was gay. The form read, "Marcus decided to explain to another child in his group that his mom is gay. He told the other child that gay is when a girl likes a girl. This kind of discussion is not acceptable in my room. I feel that parents should explain things of this nature to their own children in their own way." In theory, I could be concerned that this is a reflection about community standards (in a conservative community) in the relevance of homosexuality in “harmful to minors” determinations in COPA. See http://www.doaskdotell.com/content/copaqest.htm

76 Florida, in fact, uses language forbidding adoption by anyone "who is homosexual." In April, 1997, the ACLU filed suit to have this law struck down. Will Florida resort to the military's "presumptive" definition of homosexuality (as enacted by Congress)? The law does not by itself determine custody outcome, but it must have affected the case mentioned above.

See also 76j.

The Supreme Court, in January 2005, refused to hear a case (filed by gay foster parents) challenging a decision from the 11th Circuit (complicated by Judge Pryor) allowing the Florida gay adoption ban (unique in the nation as of 2005) to stand. The 11th Circuit apparently had maintained that the ban did not hinder the adoption of foster children in a significant way. Some activists fear that the Court’s inertia here will be interpreted by other states as a green light to pass gay adoption bans (starting with Arkansas, given that an administrative ban on gay foster parents there was overturned).

76a Ch. 5 P 250, fn 76 : New Hampshire, in fact, has had a "must ask, must tell" policy in which the prospective parents must be asked if any homosexual lives in the household. In 1999, the NH legislature will consider repeal. But Mississippi now considers a law (in 2000) banning gay couples from adopting (although perhaps not gay singles). Missisippi would also refuse to recognize adoptions by same-sex couple adoptions from other states (possibly a Full Faith and Credit violation).  Utah has administratively prohibited adoptions by “unmarried couples,” and Arkansas has also administratively prohibited lesbians and gay men, as well as heterosexuals who live with them, from adopting. (Source: ACLU Guardians of Liberty, May 31, 2000.) 

Note - April 1999 N.H. legislature repealed this law (both legislatures by wide margins) and the governor signed.

In April 2000, the Mississippi legislature approved a bill to prohibit homosexuals or same-sex couples from adopting children. 

The following states have state court rulings supporting second-parent adoptions by same-sex couples: Vermont, Massachusetts, New York, Wash. D.C., Illinois, New Jersey

These states that have higher state court rulings denying second parent adoptions,

Wisconsin, Colorado, Connecticut, (and one presumes, Florida and New Hampshire).

In these states, judges generally grant them but there is no higher state court ruling on the books:

Alabama, Alaska, California, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Washington.

In Minnesota, the state emphatically suggests that suitable single people may adopt on their own. Notorious “Dr. Laura” has insisted that a gay-couple adoptions denies a child “a mommy and a daddy,” but the practical setting may be that a child gets adopted by a same-sex couple or a single person or does not get adopted at all.

The Newark Star Ledger, on May 18, 2000, reported (in a story by Robert Cohen) that New Jersey Rep. Chris Smith introduced an amendment to a House bill ratifying the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, to bar homosexuals from traveling from the United States to adopt children overseas.  Ironically, Smith is a vocal opponent of abortion.  The proposal was criticized as contrary to “states’ rights.”  No kidding.

On June 17, 2001 PBS ran a program “Kids of Gay and Lesbian Parents.” In one case in Arkansas, teenage sons of lesbian parents were being bullied and harassed and the school principal had the temerity to say to the parents, “why don’t you change your lifestyle, when you see that it is affecting your children?” Don’t people get what’s wrong with that?  It would seem that the school system would be liable for negligence if it did not discipline the students involved.

Andrew Berg provides a discussion, “Will My Kids Be Gay,” in the September 2003 And Baby. Berg writes, “More than 30 studies comparing the children of gays and lesbians to the children of heterosexuals have shown no significant differences when it comes to sexual orientation and gender identity.”

In early 2004 Oklahoma passed a law barring recognition of adoptions by same-sex couples in other states, and took away parental rights from non biological parents (or parents by legal marriage) when passing through the state. This seems to be a misuse of state-by-state experimentation (that is, using public policy exceptions to Full Faith and Credit), a solution that has generally been credible with the gay marriage debate itself. See HRC’s commentary at http://www.hrc.org/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Room&CONTENTID=18779&TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm

76a1. From the New Jersey Law Journal:   http://law.com/nj

    http://www5.law.com/lawcom/displayid.cfm?statename=NJ&docnum=87471&table=news&flag=full

“Same-Sex Marriage Laws Are Entitled to Full Faith and Creditby Martin L. Haines, Sept. 24, 2001

   “ It is very unlikely that the U.S. Supreme Court, once it has the issue to decide, will deny application of the Full Faith and Credit Clause to same-sex marriages. It reads the clause broadly, saying its purpose is "to alter the status of the several states as independent foreign sovereignties, each free to ignore obligations created under the laws or by the judicial proceedings of the others, and to make them integral parts of a single nation. (Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287 (1942).

   “ Even if the Court refuses to apply the Full Faith and Credit Clause to same-sex marriages, it cannot avoid the application of the Constitution's equal protection and due process clauses to them. ("[No State shall] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.") “

76b  The Dutch parliament has reportedly approved both same-sex marriage and in some cases adoption, to take effect in April 2001.  The web reference is http://ruljis.leidenuniv.nl/user/cwaaldij/www/

 Ch 5 P 251. In 1997, Minneapolis mayoral candidate Barbara Carlson (the "conservative") proposed licensing for parents on public assistance. Possibly, this could have led to subsequent legislation denying parent "licenses" to gays and lesbians. Later, Carlson changed her suggestion to mandatory parenting classes for those on assistance.  

76c  On March 9, 2001 ABC 20-20 reported positively on the children of gay parents, including a teenage man raised by a lesbian couple and grade-school girls raised by a gay male couple. The gay male couple had fathered two children by artificial insemination with a surrogate mother around 1990, mixing sperms intentionally to symbolize the relationship.  All the offspring interviewed appeared well-adjusted and none had grown up to be “gay.”  Both sets of parents were in long-term relationships.  Several reported teasing and taunts when in grade or middle school.  (Of course we know that teasing has in other media-reported scenarios recently had serious consequences.)  Again, let us hope that no state tries to make artificial insemination illegal. 

However University of Southern California professors Judith Stacey and Timothy J. Biblarz released a study to the effect that “children of lesbian and gay parents are less likely to conform to traditional ideas of gender roles, gender-based career choices, and compulsory heterosexuality.” (Abilgail Garner, “Families Like Mine,” Lavender, May 18, 2001. Garner goes on to argue that such studies are defensive in nature, needing to demonstrate that children raised by gay parents won’t be gay themselves.

76d  More resources on same-sex marriage:

ACLU: http://www.aclu.org/issues/gay/gaymar.html

Freedom Network: http://www.free-market.net/directorybytopic/same-sex/

76e.  One contributor to queerlaw informs us about Robert Wintemute’s new book on same-sex partnerships. The book is  Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, Robert Wintemute and Mads Andenaes, Editors. (Hart Publishing, Oxford, England and Portland, Oregon, 2001.)

At 790 pages, the book promises to be an encyclopedic look at same-sex marriage as its legal advocacy and adoption sweeps the globe.

Authors included are (in the U.S.), Chai Feldblum, William Eskridge, Jr., Arthur Leonard, Nancy Polikoff, Evan Wolfson, Mary Bonauto, and a multitude of others who come from Australia, the UK, Canada, New Zealand, Brazil, Japan, China, India, Israel, Denmark, Spain,  . . . a total of 47 contributors.

Major parts are I. Theoretical Perspectives; II. National Law of the
U.S., Canada, Africa, Australasia, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and European States; III. European Community Law, and IV. International Law.

76f    In early 2002 the Virginia legislature considered but rejected a bill that would have banned the Virginia Housing Development Authority from making or backing joint loans for couples who were not legally married. See also 91a.

76g.   On March 22, 2002, the Minnesota house turned down a provision offering health insurance to same-sex domestic partners of state employees, overriding the wishes of Mn. Governor Jesse Ventura.

76h But Stanley Kurtz, in “Gay Priests and Gay Marriage,” National Review, June 3, 2002, tries to draw a bizarre analogy: gay marriage would “contaminate” marriage as a complementary and committed institution the way homosexuals infect the priesthood! 

Laurie Goodstein, “Vatican to Check U.S. Seminaries on Gay Presence,” The New York Times, Sept. 15, 2005, suggests a witch-hunt within 292 Roman Catholic seminaries in the United States for homosexual students and for teachers who vary from the official teachings of the church. The Vatican is supposedly going to rule on the issue of homosexuals in the priesthood (given the scandals involving minors), including whether persons with ancient homosexual activity or even just admitted latent inclinations should be banned. It seems like common sense that the scandals would not have occurred if the Church allowed (heterosexually) married men to become priests or priests to marry, in which case persons with more common values regarding parenting, family and lineage would be attracted to the priesthood, as in Protestant denominations.

76i   Here is a great tabular analysis, “Gay Marriage Rights” by Canadian Roedy Green (Canadian Mind Products) of gay marriage arguments, including (in Canadian law) the rights that same-sex couples would give up if gay marriage were legal. There is also a country-by-country international analysis, as of June 2002. The link is http://mindprod.com/marriage.html

76j  For more on Florida’s “no homosexuals” adoption law, which was upheld in 2003 by a federal appeals court: the case of Wayne LaRue Smith and Dan Skahen, who have cared for 23 foster children but were denied adoption, will be heard by the Supreme Court in early 2005. One major argument is that Florida law discriminates against their children rather than just against the couple. On the other hand, the state maintains, perhaps facetiously, that it is trying to place the children into adoption with legally married heterosexual couples. Many are very hard to place. See story (“Supreme Court Gets Adoption Case: Key West gay couple granted custody, but they can’t adopt” by Phil LaPadula in The Washington Blade, Oct. 9, 2004, at http://www.washingtonblade.com/2004/10-8/news/national/court.cfm

Now there is a new storm (January 2005) in Virginia:

What I think could happen is that such a law would revert back to the federal definition of "homosexual" in the 1993 law for the military.  This is important!

http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20050125-101106-3685r.htm

 

Proposal would ban gays from adopting children


By Christina Bellantoni

THE WASHINGTON TIMES Jan 25 2005

 

 

 RICHMOND - Lawmakers will consider a bill that would forbid homosexuals from adopting children.
     Delegate Richard H. Black has proposed a bill that would add new criteria for adoption reports filed with the circuit court. The Loudoun County Republican's bill amends the state's adoption law by adding a phrase that states: "No person under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual."

Again, this is a “must ask, must tell” law (or a “do ask do tell” law).

Now, imagine, as a thought experiment at least, a second law that requires that teachers (over a certain age) of students below a certain age or of special needs students or assistants who must give personal care have been parents themselves. Imagine also a law that says that an attendant who gives personal care to mentally impaired persons not be homosexual in the legal 1993 definition, or have stated in a public forum that he or she is. This can be a very slippery slope indeed!

"While considering this bill, the House Health, Welfare and Institutions Committee voted to significantly weaken the measure’s language, making sexual orientation and “homosexual activity” only one factor in the overall evaluation of a candidate."  This language is as follows: "this bill will now directs that the investigative report presented by the adoption agency to a judge prior to entry of an order of adoption include information on whether the petitioner is known to engage in current voluntary homosexual activity or is unmarried and cohabiting with another adult to whom he is not related by blood or marriage. This information would be in addition to information on whether the petitioner is financially able, morally suitable, in satisfactory physical and mental health and a proper person to care for and to train the child, among other criteria." (Source http://www.equalityvirginia.org/) This bill was defeated in the State Senate judicial committee in late February 2005.

For a more complete state-by-state list visit http://www.doaskdotell.com/content/gayadopt.htm

76k Dec. 29, 2004.  In Arkansas, Pulaski County circuit Judge Timothy Fox ruled that Arkansas Child Welfare Agency Review Board cannot forbid the placing of a child in a foster home merely because the home has a gay household member, and that furthermore the Board was not entitled to pass its own rules based on its view of “public morality.” One wonders what kind of pseudo due process could have established that a particular home has a gay household member. Go to http://www.doaskdotell.com/refer/chrono.htm

76l  On Aug 4 2005 Oprah Winfrey interviewed a married couple where the husband had undergone a sex change operation to female after ten years of marriage. Five years later, they were still married (with two biological children). The sex change operation did not change their legal marital status since the marriage had started as an opposite sex marriage. The marriage was abstinent or platonic, the “wife” did not consider herself to be a lesbian, but the parther who had changed was becoming more interested in men. Transgendered people typically have led straight lives.

77 (see also 76c) Barbara Kantrowitz, "Gay Families Come Out," Newsweek, Nov. 4, 1996, pp 51-56

See also Frederick Bazett, "Children of Gay Fathers" and Saralie Pennington, "Children of Lesbian Mothers," in anthology Gay and Lesbian Parents, edited by Bennett (Westport: Praeger, 1987),

Laura Benkov, Reinventing the Family: Lesbian and Gay Parents (New York: Crown, 1994), and Charlotte Patterson, "Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents," Child Development 63, #5, Oct. 1992. Also, Patterson, "Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents: Summary of Research Findings," from Sullivan, Same-Sex Marriage, op. cit., p. 140; Jerry Bigner and Frederick Bozett, "Parenting by Gay Fathers," excerpts from the Virginia Appeals Court 1994 ruling in Bottoms v. Bottoms, and important papers by Flaks, Belcastro, Wolfe, and Antiga on gay parenting.

Lisa Keen, "Children of Lesbian Mothers Don't 'Differ' Significantly," The Washington Blade, April 11, 1997, p. 14.

77a. Here are some more references on gay and lesbian parenting, adoption, and custody. Legally, this is a very fragmented area of law, differing enormously among the states and changing rapidly, and it is difficult to keep up with it in detail. :

ACLU: http://www.aclu.org/issues/gay/parent.html

Gay Parent Magazine Online: http://www.gayparentmag.com/

Lesbian mothers:  http://www.lesbian.org/lesbian-moms/adopt.html

Human Rights Campaign: http://www.hrc.org/familynet/chapter.asp?chapter=17

On Februrary 15, 2002 CNN “The Point” ran a discussion of the absolute gay adoption ban in Florida, which may now come under leagal tack from talk show host Rosie O’Donnell.  CNN presented a case a younger gay male couple in Florida, Wayne Smith and Dan Skehan, who had cared temporarily for up to ten foster children during the past year and wanted to adopt. They story made a clear case for the “best available parents” argument.

On March 24, 2002 Diane Sawyer on ABC “Primetime Live” presented a two-hour special on the adoption problem. Now both CNN and ABC report that Florida, Mississippi and Utah outlaw gay adoptions. The broadcast presented the story of a gay couple, Steve Lofton and Roger Croteau, together for 18 years, who had taken in five HIV+ children, some for foster care. Several of them had thrived into adolescence. When one of couple tried to adopt the youngest child (after Florida maintained that the child would have to be legally adopted), he was confronted by a question from Florida “asking” if he was homosexual. When he omitted the answer, he was rejected.and the state now threatens to remove the child when a heterosexual family can be found.  Rosie O’Donnell, who had come out (she has a female partner of four years) and discussed her own story as a single lesbian parent (she also is trying to adopt a foster child and has a home in Florida, so she faced the “gay” question), took an interest in their case and assisted them with a lawsuit and appeal to the 2nd Circuit.  The web site for the Lofton-Croteau case is http://www.lethimstay.com/  Primetime suggested that the issue had become particularly difficult in Florida because of the Anita Bryant backlash back in 1977 (Primetime showed Bryant getting to be a pie face).  Sawyer’s report emphasized that there are not enough prospective “heterosexual” adoptive parents for minority foster children. Many states (Minnesota included) allow and even encourage single adoptive parents because the shortage is so sever. 

Ann Oldernburg provided a story “For Rosie, coming out is merely about what’s right,” in USA Today, March 12, 2002. There is also the question of how her coming out will affect her audience as a talk show host—we expect positively in this case. Yet show business has had the attitude in the past that their stars should not make their own personal lives into public controversies (the “don’t ask don’t tell” mentality) and sometimes write this into contracts.  Again, see http://www.doaskdotell.com/content/empint.htm. See also note 149a.

See also note 75 for the Bottoms case in Virginia.

77b  Newsweek, Feb. 11, 2002 contains the article, “Don’t ‘Protect’ Me; Give Me Your respect: Growing up with a gay father wasn’t easy—but only because our society doesn’t accept families like mine,” by Abigail Garner, p. 13.

77c   On February 3, 2002, the American Academy of Pediatrics announced: Children who are born to or adopted by one member of a same-sex couple deserve the security of two legally recognized parents,” in Pediatrics. This is interpreted as “announcing its support … for the right of gay men and lesbians to adopt their partners’ children.” Erica Goode, “Group Backs Gays Who Seek to Adopt a Partner’s Child,” The New York Times, Feb. 3, 2002. These are known as “second-parent adoptions” According to the Goode article, “three states effectively ban such adoptions, seven states and Washington, D.C., permit them by law and otherwise the legal status of such adoptions varies widely.”

And there is a case in Florida (2002) involving the ability of a transgendered male (after change from female) Michael Kantaras, to maintain custody of a child conceived with artificial insemination. Here is part of the press release:

Transgender Law & Policy Institute    http://www.transgenderlaw.org/
PRESS RELEASE

Equality Florida Legal Advocacy Project Represents Transgender
Father in Custody
Battle Televised on Court TV

 For immediate release

 SAN FRANCISCO -- February 15, 2002

Anyone tuning into Michael Kantaras’ custody battle in Clearwater,
Florida
looking for “talk show” style sensationalism got an advanced

education on transgender issues instead.  Due to the unprecedented
Court TV coverage of Mr. Kantaras’ fight for his children, more
people were exposed to accurate information about transsexualism and

sex-reassignment than in any case that has ever been litigated on
behalf of a transsexual person anywhere in the country.

“We have heard from transgender people from around the country who
see this case not only a validation of their ability to marry and be

good parents, but also as an unprecedented validation of our lives
as transgender men and women,” said Kantaras co-counsel Shannon
Minter.  “In addition to Michael himself,” adds Minter, “the primary
credit for the educational impact of this case must go to
Tampa
attorney Karen Doering, the founder and director of the Equality
Florida Legal Advocacy Project, a non-profit legal organization
based in
Tampa, Florida.  Karen’s dedication to this case is what
has transformed this private battle into an amazing opportunity to
educate the country about transgender issues.”

 77d  In North Dakota, Ohio, Michigan, and Arkansas custody has been denied to gay parents who were cohabiting with same-sex partners (in a spirit similar to Bottoms in Virginia). The Surpreme Courts of N.D., Oh and MI have upheld these practives. In Idaho, visitation rights were denied to Shawn McGriff for cohabiting with his lover (Idaho Statesman, 7/11/2002) by a Bonneville County magistrate. A few states, like Arkansas, prohibit visitation in the home or dwelling space where a same-sex partner or legally unmarried partner cohabits.

78 Dr. Kenneth Morgen, Getting Simon (New York: Bramble, 1995). Morgen doesn't try to explain his desire to be a parent. The book provides detailed guidelines and forms.

See also American Psychological Association's Lesbian and Gay Parents, a Guide for Psychologists

79 Conversation with Tim Fisher, Gay and Lesbian Parents Coalition International, 1996 (and newsletter).

80 ABC "20-20" Report, Sept. 28, 1996.

81 Viatical settlement companies buy life insurance policies from terminally ill persons (not just AIDS patients( and provide cash for medical care and living expenses. This is "fending for yourself," when there is no other institutional source of health insurance, but it deprives someone of passing an estate to a loved one. Arthur Allen, "The Invisible Hand," The Washington Post Magazine, Nov. 17, 1996. There seems little doubt that in any reasonable system, the availability of some level of guaranteed-issue health insurance covering disabilities and catastrophic illnesses is essential public policy.

81a On August 4, 1999 ABC "20-20" ran a story about the sale of viatical contracts to investors by insurance "brokers." Individual investors buy the right to the partial death benefits of terminally ill persons once they die. Some investors have become "upset" that AIDS patient subjects are living unexpectedly long due to the recent use of protease inhibitors. Since this practice is targeted to the expected deaths of known, specific and named individuals (known even to the investors) this exercise of raw capitalism does incite a certain moral squeamishness; it seems to some to devalue human life.   But, to be fair, there are those who describe ethical and proper ways to pursue these investments, that may actually prolong lives. The source is http://www.viatical-expert.net/.

81b  There is more discussion of viatical contracts by Jane Bryant Quinn, “Should You Invest in Death?”  Newsweek, May 14, 2001, with discussion of a self-published book (imprint is Bialkin Books) by Gloria Wolk, Viatical Settlements: A User’s Guide, (and Cash for the Final Days) with the ambiguous convolutions of libel suits filed against the authors by two companies.  

82 Although some libertarians, while advocating total privatization of schools, also opposed vouchers; they argue vouchers lead to dependency. See also Chapter 6, note 35a. On November 14, 1999, CBS "60 Minutes" presented a story about the Edison Project, an initiative with which private corporations run public schools (including curricula and teachers) as contractors for school boards.

On August 6, 2000 CBS “60 Minutes” presented a compelling story on magnet “KIPP” public (middle) schools in Houston and in the South Bronx, New York, the idea coming from two young teachers in their early twenties in 1993.  The schools feature long school days, intensive drill on the basics, strict contracts for students and teachers who must be “on call” at all times for students, and have achieved impressive results with students from poor neighborhoods. Several corporations may help fund in other cities. This is an example of a public program started largely by private initiative, and it works.  

82a Ch. 5 P 252 pr 5.: Actually, a balanced federal budget and a flat income tax (or better, no income tax) would reduce interest rates and would tend to encourage more consumer lending and borrowing. Lenders would need to make sure borrowers live up to their voluntarily assumed obligations.

82b Ch 5 P 255, proposed definition of marriage: On Aug. 15, 1997, Louisiana offered a voluntary "covenant marriage" (for opposite sex unions, of course) that virtually eliminates no-fault divorce. Should society or private interests offer (voluntarily) privileges to those who agree to and maintain covenant marriages? (See also note 94).

82c Ch 5 P 259, pr. 5. Although we hear a lot about today's low unemployment and tremendous demand for technically skilled people (especially for the Y2K problem), older managers (at least those who did not deliberately reinvent themselves in the early 1990's) are still hard up. See Tony Horwitz, "Some Who Lost Jobs in the Early 90's Recession Find a Hard Road Back; Younger Workers Do OK, But the Over-50 Set Sees Sharp Drop in Prospects; Upside: Joys of 'Mr. Mom,'" The Wall Street Journal, June 26, 1998. People are even rejected by computer!  

82d Before Father’s Day in June 2003, CNN reported that the national unemployment rate for fathers with dependent children under 18 was 4.5% as compare to 6.1% nationally. The report did not address marriage per se. It apparently did comprise fathers with custody or actually raising their children (not divorced or unmarried fathers without custody). The report also claimed that some employers do consider the presence of dependents in making close layoff decisions. I have reported anecdotes of that elsewhere, but in general many large employers tend to do layoffs as a numbers game with a very structured, impersonal approach to protect themselves from discrimination lawsuits. In general, the unemployment problems for single mothers seem to be very severe. Whatever this report implies about gays or childless men, it also seems that people who have children before preparing themselves for stable careers often have severe employment problems. So these numbers may be deceiving, and individual circumstances may be much more important.

82e An indication of the problems of single mothers with children was illustrated by the arrest of a Brooklyn woman for leaving her young children at home when they died in a house fire while she was at work at MacDonalds as an assistant manager. Apparently she might have been fired if she had not shown up for work, and her babysitter did not show up. See story “Daily Choice Turned Deadly: Children Left on the Own” by Nina Bernstein, The New York Times, Oct 19, 2003.

83 David Boaz and R. Morris Barrett, "What Would a School Voucher Buy?" CATO Briefing Papers, No. 25, Mar. 25, 1996. Also, "Vouchers and Educational Freedom: A Debate," Cato Policy Analysis, March 12, 1997 (Bast, Harmer, Dewey). New Hampshire, with no sales tax and income tax, has among the best secondary school achievement (including private schools) in the nation.

83a Also, check Joe Viteritti, School Choice: The Constitution and Civil Society (Washington, Brookings, October 1999). Viteritti argues that school vouchers represent an opportunity to improve education for poor people, and form a proper alliance between private and public enterprise. In earlier times, private education really was available only to "the rich."

83b  Privatizing education would de-politicize controversial content (once we get beyond the legal church-and-statel arguments about vouchers for the non-sectarian component of education in private parochial schools). The Virginia General Assembly, in 2002, at least defeated a bill that would have severely restricted the presentation of “gay-related” subject matter in social studies (or health) classes in public high schools.

84 Gene Cisewski, Dave Doss, and Bill Boushka, Editorial, The Quill, March 1996, p. 4.

85 Kominas, op. cit., p. 321.

86 The Libertarian Party 1996 platform position appears in Appendix 7.

87 Gene Cisewski, "License Expired," The Quill, March 1996, p. 4.

88 William Mohr, "The Stakes in the Gay-Marriage Wars," Robert Baird and Stuart Rosenbaum, editors, Same-Sex Marriage: the Moral and Legal Debate (Amherst: Prometheus, 1997).

88a  In May 2001 Tom Green, who reportedly has 5 wives, will go on trial in Salt Lake City, Utah in the state’s first polygamy trial since the 1950s.  There are 25 children. The state maintains that “common law” defines these relationships as “marriages” and that the marriages had started underage.  The defense contends that Green is penalized for “taking responsibility” for his partners and for “telling” publicly.


89 William Eskridge, The Case for Same-Sex Marriage (New York: The Free Press 1996).

90 The government of Honduras is encouraging gay prison inmates to get married, to stop AIDS. This travesty was reported in The Advocate, Dec. 10, 1996, p. 18.

91 William Eskridge, "Credit is Due," The New Republic, June 17, 1996, p. 11. The Act would define marriage for the purpose of Federal benefits, and allow the states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.

Also, David Frum, "Gay Marriage and the Courts," The Weekly Standard, Sept. 30, 1996, p. 30.

Some commentators claim that DOMA assumes that the Full Faith and Credit clause would not apply to "marriage"; instead there is just an extension of the amorphous notion of "comity." The FFC clause is more concerned, say, with honoring court judgments than with the recognition of social "contracts" largely defined through tradition. Further, states would not be required to honor civil arrangements (from other states) if these arrangements violate their own "public policy."

In May 2002 Rep. Bob Barr from Florida (Rep), with the backing of the socially conservative “Alliance for Marriage,” introduced a “Federal Marriage Amendment” (FMA) in the House of Representatives, limiting the only acceptable definition of marriage to be between a male and female. It is unclear to me whether this would apply only at the federal level or whether it would wipe out all domestic partnership laws in benefits passed by states and local governments. See my “Amendment 29” in Chapter 6 of DADT. But the text of the amendment reads

"Marriage in the United  States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman."

It adds, "Neither this constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital
status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups."

D.C. Congressional Delegate Walter Fauntroy supported the idea, saying "As an African American, I am particularly sensitive to and
knowledgeable of the value of the institution of marriage and the family," Fauntroy said. "For we, as African Americans, were subjected
to the most cruel form of slavery in the history of the world, a slavery based on the destruction of the family as a vehicle of
culture, socialization and procreation."

The organization is :
Alliance for Marriage
P.O. Box 26188
Alexandria, Va. 22313

703-425-9060
http://www.allianceformarriage.org/

See the Lou Chibbaro article in The Washington Blade, May 17, 2002.

91a In Virginia it is illegal for private companies to offer domestic parent benefits to non-legally married partners when they otherwise would choose to do so. A bill was introduced in 2003 to repeal this law but tabled in committee despite the lack of objection. The Family Foundation of Virginia wrote a press release that seemed to convey the idea that companies would be required to offer these benefits (they would not), and then this:

“Victory Alert: Last gasp effort by homosexual movement dies

A bill that would have expanded health insurance coverage beyond a spouse or
child to include "any household member" chosen by the beneficiary was killed
yesterday in a House committee by a vote of 13-6.  Delegate Kathy Byron
(R-22,
Lynchburg) led the charge to protect the family by working to kill
the bill that was championed by homosexual rights groups, including
"Equality Virginia" and the Log Cabin Republicans.  In opposing the bill
Byron stated, "One of the fundamental values that I hold dear in my life is
that family means mother, father and children."

What they are saying, however, seems to be that a company that offers health insurance benefits to non-married domestic partners will raise premiums and copayments for “normal married people” in a zero-sum-game world. That sounds like a dubious speculation.

91b  (From an AP story in May 2004)  Virginia has passed a new “defense of marriage” law that takes effect on June 30, 2004.  The new law is an amendment to the state's 1997 Affirmation of Marriage Act, which prohibits gay marriages in Virginia.  The amendment extends that prohibition to civil unions, partnership contracts and other "arrangements between persons of the same sex purporting to bestow the privileges or obligations of marriage."

        Virginia's attorney general and other supporters say the law provides a needed safeguard for the institution of marriage and does not deprive anyone of individual rights.

        But some lawyers say the law is so vague and ill-defined that it could interfere with legal contracts such as powers of attorney, wills, medical directives, child custody and property arrangements and joint bank accounts, perhaps even joint mortgages and leases..

The bill's sponsor, Del. Robert Marshall, a Republican from Prince William County, said the law is aimed at preventing same-sex couples from enjoying the benefits of marriage through other means.  New Jersey has a partnership law taking effect July 1.

        "Civil union is a proxy for marriage and domestic partnership is a proxy for civil unions," Marshall said.

        Virginia Attorney General Jerry Kilgore, the likely Republican nominee for governor next year, echoed this in an advisory opinion, saying he believed the law was constitutionally defendable.

Virginia is the only state where companies not large enough to underwrite their own insurance policies are forbidden to offer domestic partner benefits.  The state prohibits joint adoptions by same-sex couples and refuses to list the names of same-sex couples from other states on the birth certificates of children adopted here.

 

92 David Mixner, Stranger Among Friends, (New York: Bantam, 1996).

93 Liz Spayd and Brigid Quinn, "The Gay Marriage Trap: We Fell Into a Right-Wing Ambush," The Washington Post, Outlook, page C1, June 16, 1996.

94 Gallagher suggests that the law should at least allow lifetime binding agreements. Maggie Gallagher, The Abolition of Marriage: How We Destroy Lasting Love (Washington: Regnery, 1996), p. 250. But Andrew Sullivan points out that marriage is a constitutional right recognized by the Supreme Court even before women's suffrage. Laws restricting marriage for convicts and deadbeat dads have been held unconstitutional. Can it be unconstitutional to withhold recognition of privileged status for a personal relationship that persons nor in such a relationship must pay for? How can legal recognition of a religious ceremony be a fundamental right (or entitlement)?

But the conservative case against honoring even a golden "wedding" anniversary for a same-sex couple starts with the rune, "women tame men" (George Gilder and George Will).

95</